//
you're reading...
Metaphysics

Ayn Rand – Kristina

Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum was born in 1905, in St. Petersburg. She later described her earliest approach to life as being an “enormous series” of questions aimed at understanding the things around her, and this curiosity blossomed throughout her childhood. By the time she was 12, she had begun asking why she liked what she did, and had begun integrating her ideas into wider generalizations. She recorded her views in a diary and analyzed why they were important and on what evidence they were based. She covered some of the traditional problems of philosophy: freedom, individualism, relationship between reason and freedom, and the value of freedom for the individual. The Russian Revolution was her first confrontation with the ethics of altruism, a concept she rejected.

When she was thirteen, she wrote in her journal: “Today I decided to be an atheist”. She reasoned that if “God is perfect and man can never be that perfect, the idea necessarily makes man low and imperfect and places something above him”, and thus degrades men. This foreshadows a theme of Rand’s mature thought: the issue of reason versus mysticism and the connection of the issue to human values. To her, commitment to atheism was a consequence of an overall commitment to reason: “if something cannot be proved by reason, then it’s nonsense”.

She attended Petrograd State University as a history major, and also studied philosophy. She was quick to reject anything with the merest hint of obscurity and mysticism, and favoured Aristotle and Nietzsche, embracing the latter’s exaltation of the exceptional individual.

After university, she visited relatives in America in 1925, and soon emigrated there permanently, changing her name to Ayn Rand. She took odd jobs (screenwriter, costume designer) to pay for her basic living expenses, but her passion was writing. Her first major success was her novel The Fountainhead, the main character of which embodies the theme of individualism over collectivism – a theme that developed from her condemnation of Communism during the Russian Revolution.

Rand’s major work was Atlas Shrugged, in which she introduces her new philosophy of Objectivism. There were four main ideas that Objectivism dealt with: metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and politics. She said that reality exists as an objective absolute (facts are facts, no matter what), and that reason is man’s only way of understanding reality. I quite agree with this – it certainly simplifies the question of reality  – a fact of life that should just be accepted as existing. She held that man must exist for his own sake, and the pursuit of his own interests and happiness was his highest purpose in life. I like this idea too – I agree with it whole-heartedly (call me a selfish being). In politics, her philosophy held that laissez-faire capitalism was the only way to go. I don’t agree with this – to me, laissez-faire government isn’t a smart idea – but I do agree with some of her other opinions though – that abortion should be legal, that involuntary military conscription shouldn’t be put into action, and that censorship should not be implemented, to name a few.

Advertisements

Discussion

One thought on “Ayn Rand – Kristina

  1. Excellent post. As I’m sure you know, Ayn Rand ideas about political organization(the whole laissez faire thing) have been exalted and adopted by many on the far right, particularly in the United States. Based on what you’ve said about her religious beliefs, and her Objectivist philosophy being based in a complete reliance on reason rather than mysticism and faith, how would you say she would feel about some of her ideas being adopted by, and being exalted personally by, a group of people who seem so antithetical to her basic philosophical Objectivist beliefs?

    Also, you said you agreed with her ideas about absolute reality and objective truth because, and I quote ” it certainly simplifies the question of reality”. Firstly, is that really true? And secondly, even accepting the premise, does that make it agreeable and right? Why do you think that is true?

    I also wonder a bit about how her Objectivist views interplayed with her political and social beliefs, if at all. You dismissed her ideas on laissez-faire capitalism simply by stating you didn’t agree with it, while simultaneously agreeing with Ayn Rand on many other things, particularly her basic Objectivist philosophical underpinnings. Is that idea of laissez-faire not, in Ayn Rand’s explanation, a natural conclusion of Objectivism? And if not, why not? What premise or conclusion do you disagree with in that line of thought, whatever it is? I’m interested in hearing what you have to say. Looking forward to the reply!

    Posted by liamthesaint | October 26, 2012, 5:40 pm

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: